A little ditty by me about “The City” over at FREEwilliamsburg.
Rick Warren’s Non-Negotiable Worldview
Here’s a taste:
Rick Warren routinely claims to not be a part of the Evangelical Right when speaking to secular elitists at the New York Times, but he’s playing both sides of the fence. Warren has gone on record calming that he’s “firmly a cultural conservative.” He also believes opposing abortion, gay rights, stem cell research, human cloning, and euthanasia are “non-negotiable” and “not even debatable” for people of values. He called the Terry Schiavo debacle “an atrocity worthy of Nazism” and according to ABC news, compared gay intimacy to sex with a horse. Prior to the 2004 election, Warren set-up voter registration booths on Saddleback’s church patio. Most tellingly, he sent letters to 150,000 pastors insisting they encourage their congregations to vote for Bush.
In light of the passing of Proposition 8–an issue Obama has yet to show leadership on–choosing Warren for the invocation is a slap in the face to homosexuals and Obama’s liberal base. As PFAW points out, Warren has “compared marriage by loving and committed same-sex couples to incest and pedophilia.” Sorry Rick, giving donuts to Prop 8 protestors doesn’t make your positions any more palatable.
Read it all at the Huffington Post.
The Gotcha Effect of Civil Unions
I’m sounding off on Proposition 8 over at Huffington Post. Here’s a taste:
Now that we’ve all recovered from the jubilation of last week’s victory, is it too soon to launch a couple of sober criticisms at our president elect? I did my part to ensure victory, after all. I sent my campaign check. I wept tears of joy into my beer, a Sixpoint “Hop Obama” Ale no less, while watching the acceptance speech. I cheered like a star-stricken tween at the sight of Axelrod….
It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Californians voted to overturn same-sex marriage. But it is disheartening that they’re getting all the blame. After all, by collectively rubber-stamping the Obama campaign’s “politically safe” pro-civil unions stance, democrats were inadvertent enablers.
Consider, for example how unfriendly the Obama camp was to same-sex couples during the Biden/Palin debate:
GWEN IFILL: Let’s try to avoid nuance, Senator. Do you support gay marriage?
BIDEN: No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage…..
PALIN: Your question to him was whether he supported gay marriage and my answer is the same as his and it is that I do not.
IFILL: Wonderful. You agree. On that note, let’s move to foreign policy.
I don’t remember if Palin winked for effect, but I’m assuming she didn’t. She’d already knocked it out of the park. This could have been the “gotcha moment” the drooling, caddish pundits had so eagerly awaited. But since America long ago concluded that no candidate in his/her right mind could ever confess to supporting gay marriage, it failed to deliver. Instead, the “gotcha” intended for Biden came at the expense of same-sex couples striving for what the Constitution promises: equal rights.
Now, go read the whole damn thing.
Really Camille?!
I have a new essay on Sarah Palin over at Radar. Here’s a sample:
“Sarah Palin has made the biggest step forward in feminism since Madonna,” Camille Paglia wrote in a recent Salon column….. “Palin represent[s] an explosion of a brand new style of muscular American feminism.”
In Palin’s case “muscular feminism” is really quite literal. Our potential president-in-waiting is a chaste dominatrix who wants to bully her way into your private life and declare control of your uterus. She may not be able to talk the “first dude” into trimming his nasty pubic-hair goatee, but she knows how to skin a caribou. She played basketball in high school. And who cares if she’s opposed to a woman’s right to choose? She can tear the still-beating heart of a moose from its chest, all without breaking a nail.
As Palin demonstrates, muscular feminism isn’t about progressiveness, equality, or integrity. It’s about proving you can talk tough, just like the boys, even if what you’re saying is totally retarded. If she were a man, we’d call her a meathead. A bully. She wouldn’t be a hockey mom, she’d be a dumb jock. But who cares about the issues? Let’s just watch her flex.
You can read it all here.
Too Slack, Cynical, And Disaffected To Fight
Gawker day editor Alex Pareene has an hilarious rebuttal to my article posted on Radar. Here’s my favorite line:
Years later, none of us are entirely sure why anyone claimed to enjoy the sounds Eddie Vedder makes. Perry Ferrell. Christ, what were drugs even made of in the 1990s?
In my defense, I always fucking hated Pearl Jam and Jane’s Addiction and I wasn’t too keen on the criminally overrated Nirvana for that matter. (If you want to embarrass us bring up Trent Reznor).
Anyway, my article’s primary intent was to frame boomers for hypocrisy and favoritism. Sure, I take lots of shots at Millennials along the way, but come on, a little friction is par for the course in an article about generational angst. Historically speaking, the boomers were criticized. Gen X was criticized. The Millennials are now getting their turn. It’s a rite of passage. Radar came up with the title “Generation Slap: A Call to Arms Against Millennials.” It was a smart move on their part since it attracted lots of attention. But if you go back and read it, you’ll see that most of my venom is reserved for boomers and with a media that credits Millennials with our achievements. And come on, who doesn’t think Of Montreal is retarded for doing this. Now get off my lawn…. I’m trying to read an antiquated little thing known as a book.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next Page »